Author: Annabel Prescott, Traction For Young People Youth program evaluation faces a critical ethical question: Who is evaluation data for?
Drawing on Feedback Informed Treatment principles and youth empowerment frameworks, this presentation argues that when young people engage with their own data to understand and celebrate their growth, evaluation becomes a tool for agency rather than extraction.
Using TRACTION, a Queensland youth mentoring organisation, as a case study, we examine how internationally validated screening tools serve young people first and organisational learning second. Young people complete visual assessments at program entry, engage with their progress through facilitated conversations during the program, and review before-and-after results at completion. They keep their own copies and use their data in conversations with family, teachers, and others. This process makes visible the work young people have done, enabling them to name and claim their own progress.
The presentation explores three critical tensions:
1. How do we design evaluation that acknowledges young people as active participants in their own change process, not passive subjects of measurement? 2. What shifts when we position self-awareness and celebration as primary evaluation outcomes, with strategic metrics as secondary? 3. How do we ensure data collection practices honour young people's agency rather than extracting information purely for organisational purposes?
We present real examples of facilitated data conversations, visual assessment tools, and moments when young people recognise their own growth through evidence. When evaluation is grounded in participant empowerment, where people understand, acknowledge, and celebrate their own growth, it creates a foundation for ethical strategic data use.
This approach transfers to evaluation with any structurally marginalised population: First Nations communities, people experiencing disadvantage, or those marginalised by traditional service systems. Attendees will leave with critical questions for examining whether their own evaluation practices serve participant agency or organisational needs first.
